The activeness, critical, and creative thinking skills of students in the Lesson Study-based inquiry and cooperative learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v5i1.7328Keywords:
Critical thinking skill, creative thinking skill, inquiry, lesson studyAbstract
The implementation of innovative learning and lesson study (LS) are potential to improve student thinking skills and activeness differently and mostly implemented separately. This study aimed to explore and compare the student critical and creative thinking skills as well as student activeness in the inquiry and cooperative models combined with LS-based learning practice. This was a descriptive quantitative study that was conducted at Islamic Senior High School 1 of Bengkulu. The sample was two classes consisted of 33 and 32 students each that conducted LS-inquiry and LS-cooperative learning. The essay test delivered to measure critical and creative thinking skills and observation sheet to measure student activeness. The data were analyzed by t-test to compare critical and creative thinking skills as well as the student activeness between the LS-inquiry and LS-cooperative classes. The result showed that LS-inquiry learning improved the student critical and creative thinking skills that significantly higher than LS-cooperative learning. The student activeness improved gradually as LS cycles during learning processes in either inquiry or cooperative learning, but no significant difference between these two learning models. It showed that inquiry learning plays a dominant influence in critical and creative thinking skills improvement, whereas LS in student activeness improvement otherwise.
Downloads
References
Bellanca, J., Brandt, R., Barell, J., Darling-Hammond, L., Dede, C., Dufour, R., … Seif, E. (2010). 21st century skills: Rethinking how students learn. In J. Bellanca & R. Brandt (Eds.), 21st century skills: Rethinking how students learn (pp. 1–27). Solution Tree Press. Retrieved from http://www.edugains.ca/resources 21CL/Research/Readings/21stCenturySkills_Re-ThinkingHowStudentsLearn.pdf
Bensley, D. A., & Spero, R. A. (2014). Improving critical thinking skills and metacognitive monitoring through direct infusion. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 12, 55–68. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2014.02.001
Cajkler, W., Wood, P., Norton, J., & Pedder, D. (2013). Lesson Study: towards a collaborative approach to learning in initial teacher education? Cambridge Journal of Education, 43(4), 537–554. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2013.834037
Canzoneri, E., di Pellegrino, G., Herbelin, B., Blanke, O., & Serino, A. (2016). Conceptual processing is referenced to the experienced location of the self, not to the location of the physical body. Cognition, 154, 182–192. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.05.016
Cerbin, W., & Kopp, B. (2006). Lesson study as a model for building pedagogical knowledge and improving teaching. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 18(3), 250–257. Retrieved from http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/pdf/IJTLHE110.pdf
Chang, Y., Li, B., Chen, H., & Chiu, F. (2014). Investigating the synergy of critical thinking and creative thinking in the course of integrated activity in Taiwan. Educational Psychology, 35(3), 341–360. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2014.920079
Chong, W. H., & Kong, C. A. (2012). Teacher collaborative learning and teacher self-efficacy: The case of lesson study. Journal of Experimental Education, 80(3), 263–283. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0022097 3.2011.596854
Cremin, T., Glauert, E., Craft, A., Compton, A., & Styliandou, F. (2015). Creative little scientists: Exploring pedagogical synergies between inquiry-based and creative approaches in Early Years science. Education 3-13: International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 43(4), 404–419. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2015.1020655
Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., & Stewart, I. (2014). An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21st century. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 12, 43–52. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.12.004
Ennis, R. H. (1985). A logical basis for measuring critical thinking skills. Educational Leadership, 43(2), 44–48. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/80a7/c7d4a98987590751df4b1bd9adf747fd7aaa.pdf
Ennis, R. H. (2011). The nature of critical thinking: An outline of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. In International Conference on Thinking (pp. 1–8). Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Retrieved from https://education.illinois.edu/docs/default-source/faculty-documents/robert-ennis/thenatu reofcriticalthinking_51711_000.pdf?sfvrsn=7bb51288_2
Falahudin, I., Wigati, I., & Pujiastuti, A. (2016). Pengaruh model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa pada pembelajaran materi pengelolaan lingkungan di SMP Negeri 2 Tanjung Lago, Kabupaten Banyuasin. Bioilmi, 2(2), 92–101. Retrieved from http://jurnal.radenfatah.ac.id/index.php/bioilmi/article/view/1133/951
Gengarelly, L. M., & Abrams, E. D. (2009). Closing the gap: Inquiry in research and the secondary science classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(1), 74–84. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10956-008-9134-2
Guleker, R. (2015). Instructional strategies to foster critical thinking: Self-reported practices of the faculty in Albania. International Journal of Teaching and Education, 3(4), 6–14. doi: https://doi.org/10.20472/TE. 2015.3.4.002
Huff, P. L. (2014). The goal project: A group assignment to encourage creative thinking, leadership abilities and communication skills. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 23(6), 582–594. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2014.974198
Jiang, F., & McComas, W. F. (2015). The effects of inquiry teaching on student science achievement and attitudes: evidence from propensity score analysis of PISA data. International Journal of Science Education, 37(3), 554–576. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.1000426
Jocz, J. A., Zhai, J., & Tan, A. L. (2014). Inquiry learning in the Singaporean context: Factors affecting student interest in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 36(15), 2596–2618. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.908327
Johnson, E. B. (2002). Contextual teaching and learning: What it is and why it’s here to stay. California: Corwin Press. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/U3Ldxu
Kampylis, P., & Berki, E. (2014). Nurturing creative thinking. Geneva: Unesco. Retrieved from http://www.ibe. unesco.org/sites/default/files/resources/edu-practices_25_eng.pdf
Kruit, P. M., Oostdam, R. J., Berg, E. Van Den, & Schuitema, J. A. (2018). Assessing students’ ability in performing scientific inquiry: Instruments for measuring science skills in primary education. Research in Science & Technological Education, 36(4), 413–439. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1421 530
Kurniawan, R. Y. (2016). Identifikasi permasalahan pendidikan di Indonesia untuk meningkatkan mutu dan profesionalisme guru. In Konvensi Nasional Pendidikan Indonesia (pp. 1415–1420). Jakarta: Universitas Negeri Jakarta. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317184069_identifikasi_per masalahan_pendidikan_di_indonesia_untuk_meningkatkan_mutu_dan_profesionalisme_guru
Lai, E. R. (2011). Critical thinking: A literature review. Retrieved from https://images.pearsonassessments.com/images/tmrs/CriticalThinkingReviewFINAL.pdf
Leow, F.-T., & Neo, M. (2014). Interactive multimedia learning: innovating classroom education in a Malaysian University. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(2), 99–110. Retrieved from http://www.tojet.net/articles/v13i2/13211.pdf
Lewis, C., & Perry, R. (2006). Professional development through lesson study: progress and challenges in the U.S. Tsukuba Journal of Educational Study in Mathematics, 25, 89–106. Retrieved from http://www.human.tsukuba.ac.jp/~mathedu/2510.pdf
Liu, Z. K., He, J., & Li, B. (2015). Critical and creative thinking as learning processes at top-ranking Chinese middle schools: possibilities and required improvements. High Ability Studies, 26(1), 139–152. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2015.1015501
Madhuri, G. V., Kantamreddi, V. S. S. N., & Prakash-Goteti, L. N. S. (2012). Promoting higher order thinking skills using inquiry-based learning. European Journal of Engineering Education, 37(2), 117–123. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2012.661701
Maryani, I., Martaningsih, S. T., & Bhakti, C. P. (2017). Module based on pedagogical content knowledge to increase the engagement and skills of the future teachers in designing a lesson plan. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 11(1), 91–102. doi: https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v11i1.5758
Miri, B., David, B. C. C., & Uri, Z. (2007). Purposely teaching for the promotion of higher-order thinking skills: a case of critical thinking. Research in Science Education, 37(4), 353–369. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11165-006-9029-2
Piergiovanni, P. R. (2014). Creating a critical thinker. College Teaching, 62(3), 86–93. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1080/87567555.2014.896775
Prayogi, S., Yuanita, L., & Wasis, W. (2017). Critical-inquiry-based-learning: Model of learning to promote critical thinking ability of pre-service teachers. IOP Conference Series: Journal of Physics, 947(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/947/1/012013
Quitadamo, I. J., Faiola, C. L., Johnson, J. E., & Kurtz, M. J. (2008). Community-based inquiry improves critical thinking in general education biology. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 7(3), 327–337. doi: https:// doi.org/10.1187/cbe.07-11-0097
Rahabav, P. (2016). The effectiveness of academic supervision for teachers. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(9), 47–55. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1095817.pdf
Retno, R. S., & Yuhanna, W. L. (2016). The learning of science basic concept by using scientifiq inquiry to improve student’s thinking, working, and scientific attitude abilities. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 2(1), 2442–3750. doi: https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v2i1.2703
Rock, T. C., & Wilson, C. (2005). Improving teaching through lesson study. Teacher Education Quarterly, 32(1), 77–92. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ795305.pdf
Rospitasari, R., Harahap, M. B., & Derlina, D. (2017). The effect of scientific inquiry learning model and creative thinking skills on student’s science process skills. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 7(4), 55–57. doi: https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0704035557
Sandika, B., & Fitrihidajati, H. (2018). Improving creative thinking skills and scientific attitude through inquiry-based learning in basic biology lecture toward students of biology education. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 4(1), 23–28. doi: https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v4i1.5326
Schleicher, A. (2018). Pisa 2015 result in focus. doi: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-en
Schleicher, A., & Echazarra, A. (2016). Country note - Program for international student assessment (PISA) result from PISA 2015. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/PISA-2015-Indonesia.pdf
Scibinetti, P., Tocci, N., & Pesce, C. (2011). Motor creativity and creative thinking in children: The diverging role of inhibition. Creativity Research Journal, 23(3), 262–272. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419. 2011.595993
Shivhare, R., & Kumar, C. A. (2016). On the cognitive process of abstraction. In Procedia - Procedia Computer Science (Vol. 89, pp. 243–252). doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.06.051
Smith, M. H. (2013). Findings show lesson study can be an effective model for professional development of 4-H volunteers. California Agriculture, 67(1), 54–61. doi: https://doi.org/10.3733/ca.v067n01p54
Susetyarini, E., & Miharja, F. J. (2017). The implementantion of lesson study-learning community for prospective biology teachers. International Journal of Advanced Research (IJAR), 5(10), 1228–1235. doi: https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/5641
Thompson, T. (2017). Teaching creativity through inquiry science. Gifted Child Today, 40(1), 29–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217516675863
Tzelepi, M., & Papanikolaou, K. (2018). Critical thinking for personalization in communities of inquiry. In 2018 IEEE 18th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) (pp. 304–306). IEEE. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2018.00077
Willingham, D. T. (2008). Critical thinking: Why is it so hard to teach? American Educator, 109(4), 21–32. doi: https://doi.org/10.3200/AEPR.109.4.21-32
Wood, K. (2018). The many faces of lesson study and learning study. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 7(1), 2–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-10-2017-0047
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in JPBI, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the publishing right to the publisher.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
