Students’ curiosity profile in excretion system topic taught using authentic inquiry learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v5i3.7689Keywords:
authentic inquiry learning, curiosity profile, excretion systemAbstract
Curiosity is a basic important aspect encourages students in finding various information which, in turn, aid them to encompass the concept learnt. This descriptive research aimed at elaborating the curiosity profile of junior high school students in science learning, particularly in excretion system topic who were taught using the authentic inquiry learning. This research was conducted at SMP Negeri 14 Yogyakarta with 32 of eight graders as the subjects. The instrument used was curiosity response questionnaire. The data obtained was analyzed using percentage. The results showed that the average of curiosity achievement obtained was categorized as strong (75%). However, the comparison of implementations between the authentic inquiry learning and the other learning models are needed to get more comprehensive information.
Downloads
References
Amar, A. D., & Mullaney, K. (2017). Employee ability to innovate: How can organizations recognize it. In Procedia Computer Science (Vol. 122, pp. 494–501). Elsevier B.V. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.398
Artuner, G., Uzun, F., & Ilbars, Z. (2012). Works carried out by higher education institutions for academic evaluations and quality improvement studies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 62, 1255–1259. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.214
Astiani, A., Martawijaya, M. A., & Hustim, R. (2015). Kemampuan menarik kesimpulan berdasarkan tabel dan grafik fisika pada peserta didik Kelas X(MIA) SMA Barrang Lompo. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 3(2), 166–175. doi: https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v3i2.264
Baniyamin, N., & Rashid, M. M. (2016). Understanding science centre engagement in nurturing visitor interest and curiosity. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 222, 235–243. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.152
Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83(2), 39–43. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903505415
Budwig, N. (2015). Concepts and tools from the learning sciences for linking research, teaching and practice around sustainability issues. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 16, 99–104. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.08.003
Cain, J. (2019). We should pay more attention to student curiosity. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 11(7), 651–654. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2019.03.001
Candrasekaran, S. (2014). Developing scientific attitude, critical thinking and creative intelligence of higher secondary school biology students by applying synectics techniques. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 3(6), 1–8. Retrieved from http://www.ijhssi.org/papers/v3(6)/Version-2/A03620108.pdf
Cannady, M. A., Vincent-Ruz, P., Chung, J. M., & Schunn, C. D. (2019). Scientific sensemaking supports science content learning across disciplines and instructional contexts. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 59, 101802. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101802
Chiang, C. L., & Lee, H. (2016). The effect of project-based learning on learning motivation and problem-solving ability of vocational high school students. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(9), 709–712. doi: https://doi.org/10.7763/IJIET.2016.V6.779
Chiappetta, E. L., & Koballa, T. R. (2010). Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools: Developing fundamental knowledge and skills (7th ed.). Pearson. Retrieved from https://www.pearson.com/us/higher-education/product/Chiappetta-Science-Instruction-in-the-Middle-and-Secondary-Schools-Developing-Fundamental-Knowledge-and-Skills-7th-Edition/9780137153046.html
Chu, S. K. W., Reynolds, R. B., Tavares, N. J., Notari, M., & Lee, C. W. Y. (2017). 21st Century skills development through inquiry-based learning. Singapore: Springer Singapore. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2481-8
Cinnirella, F., & Schueler, R. (2018). Nation building: The role of central spending in education. Explorations in Economic History, 67, 18–39. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eeh.2017.08.002
Ciolan, L., & Ciolan, L. E. (2014). Two perspectives, same reality? How authentic is learning for students and for their teachers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 142, 24–28. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.581
Clark, S., Harbaugh, A. G., & Seider, S. (2019). Fostering adolescent curiosity through a question brainstorming intervention. Journal of Adolescence, 75, 98–112. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.07.007
Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st-century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 300–314. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487105285962
Dobber, M., Zwart, R., Tanis, M., & van Oers, B. (2017). Literature review: The role of the teacher in inquiry-based education. Educational Research Review, 22, 194–214. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.002
Falloon, G. (2019). Using simulations to teach young students science concepts: An Experiential Learning theoretical analysis. Computers and Education, 135, 138–159. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.03.001
FitzGibbon, L., Moll, H., Carboni, J., Lee, R., & Dehghani, M. (2019). Counterfactual curiosity in preschool children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 183, 146–157. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2018.11.022
Gajardo, F. G., & Carmenado, I. de los R. (2012). Professional certification for School Principals: Approach of a competence based profile for education quality improvement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 917–925. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.224
Galeshi, R., & Bolin, R. M. (2019). The influence of correctional education, skill proficiency, and lifelong learning on social outcomes of incarcerated individuals: Results from PIAAC. The Social Science Journal. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2019.09.007
Gerritsen-van Leeuwenkamp, K. J., Joosten-ten Brinke, D., & Kester, L. (2019). Students’ perceptions of assessment quality related to their learning approaches and learning outcomes. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 63, 72–82. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.07.005
Gillies, R. M., & Rafter, M. (2019). Using visual, embodied, and language representations to teach the 5E instructional model of inquiry science. Teaching and Teacher Education, 87. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102951
Greenstein, L. (2012). Assessing 21st century skills: A guide to evaluating mastery and authentic learning. California United State of America: Corwin Press. Retrieved from https://us.corwin.com/en-us/nam/assessing-21st-century-skills/book237748
Habók, A., & Nagy, J. (2016). In-service teachers’ perceptions of project-based learning. SpringerPlus, 5, 83. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-1725-4
Hagtvedt, L. P., Dossinger, K., Harrison, S. H., & Huang, L. (2019). Curiosity made the cat more creative: Specific curiosity as a driver of creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 150, 1–13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.10.007
Hamalik, O. (2010). Kurikulum dan pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. Retrieved from http://library.um.ac.id/free-contents/index.php/buku/detail/kurikulum-dan-pembelajaran-oemar-hamalik-38275.html
Hammami, S., Saeed, F., Mathkour, H., & Arafah, M. A. (2019). Continuous improvement of deaf student learning outcomes based on an adaptive learning system and an Academic Advisor Agent. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 536–546. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.006
Huang, C. Q., Han, Z. M., Li, M. X., Jong, M. S. yung, & Tsai, C. C. (2019). Investigating students’ interaction patterns and dynamic learning sentiments in online discussions. Computers and Education, 140. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.05.015
Iucu, R. B., & Marin, E. (2014). Authentic learning in adult education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 142, 410–415. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.702
Jamalzadeh, M., & Shahsavar, Z. (2015). The effects of contextual factors on teacher‘s beliefs and practices. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192, 166–171. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.024
Jerrim, J., Oliver, M., & Sims, S. (2019). The relationship between inquiry-based teaching and students’ achievement. New evidence from a longitudinal PISA study in England. Learning and Instruction, 61, 35–44. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.12.004
Jiang, Y., Clarke-Midura, J., Keller, B., Baker, R. S., Paquette, L., & Ocumpaugh, J. (2018). Note-taking and science inquiry in an open-ended learning environment. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 55, 12–29. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.08.004
Keinänen, M., Ursin, J., & Nissinen, K. (2018). How to measure students’ innovation competences in higher education: Evaluation of an assessment tool in authentic learning environments. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 58, 30–36. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.05.007
Kumpulainen, K., & Rajala, A. (2017). Dialogic teaching and students’ discursive identity negotiation in the learning of science. Learning and Instruction, 48, 23–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.05.002
Kyriakides, L., Stylianou, A., & Eliophotou Menon, M. (2019). The link between educational expenditures and student learning outcomes: Evidence from Cyprus. International Journal of Educational Development, 70. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2019.102081
Lamnina, M., & Chase, C. C. (2019). Developing a thirst for knowledge: How uncertainty in the classroom influences curiosity, affect, learning, and transfer. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 59. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101785
Liao, C. W., Chen, C. H., & Shih, S. J. (2019). The interactivity of video and collaboration for learning achievement, intrinsic motivation, cognitive load, and behavior patterns in a digital game-based learning environment. Computers and Education, 133, 43–55. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.013
MacCann, C., Fogarty, G. J., & Roberts, R. D. (2012). Strategies for success in education: Time management is more important for part-time than full-time community college students. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(5), 618–623. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.09.015
McNew-Birren, J., & van den Kieboom, L. A. (2017). Exploring the development of core teaching practices in the context of inquiry-based science instruction: An interpretive case study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 74–87. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.04.001
Min, K. C., Rashid, A. M., & Nazri, M. I. (2012). Teachers’ understanding and practice towards thematic approach in teaching Integrated Living Skills (ILS) in Malaysia. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(23), 273–281. Retrieved from http://www.ijhssnet.com/journals/Vol_2_No_23_December_2012/31.pdf
Mora, H., Signes-Pont, M. T., Fuster-Guilló, A., & Pertegal-Felices, M. L. (2020). A collaborative working model for enhancing the learning process of science & engineering students. Computers in Human Behavior, 103, 140–150. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.09.008
Murtonen, M., Gruber, H., & Lehtinen, E. (2017). The return of behaviourist epistemology: A review of learning outcomes studies. Educational Research Review, 22, 114–128. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.001
Mussel, P. (2013). Introducing the construct curiosity for predicting job performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(4), 453–472. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1809
Pop, M. M., & Giurgiulescu, M. (2015). The developing of emotional-formative competence of the future teachers, important factor in ensuring the future quality of education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 209, 389–394. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.209
Purwanto, M. N. (2009). Prinsip-prinsip dan teknik evaluasi pengajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya. Retrieved from http://library.um.ac.id/free-contents/index.php/buku/detail/prinsip-prinsip-dan-teknik-evaluasi-pengajaran-m-ngalim-purwanto-26751.html
Rahmaniar, R., Haris, A., & Martawijaya, M. A. (2015). Kemampuan Merumuskan Hipotesis Fisika Pada Peserta Didik Kelas XMIA SMA Barrang Lompo. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 3(3), 231–240. doi: https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v3i3.276
Ramdhani, N., Ancok, D., Swasono, Y., & Suryanto, P. (2012). Teacher quality improvement program: Empowering teachers to increasing a quality of Indonesian’s education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 1836–1841. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.134
Reisner, A., Burns, T. G., Hall, L. B., Jain, S., Weselman, B. C., De Grauw, T. J., … Chern, J. J. (2017). Quality improvement in concussion care: Influence of guideline-based education. Journal of Pediatrics, 184, 26–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.01.045
Riduwan. (2009). Dasar-dasar statistika. (P. D. Iswara, Ed.). Bandung: Alfabeta. Retrieved from http://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=716954
Saariaho, E., Toom, A., Soini, T., Pietarinen, J., & Pyhältö, K. (2019). Student teachers’ and pupils’ co-regulated learning behaviours in authentic classroom situations in teaching practicums. Teaching and Teacher Education, 85, 92–104. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.06.003
Sabirin, R., Muris, & Yani, A. (2016). Penerapan pendekatan ilmiah terhadap kemampuan merancang percobaan dan hasil belajar fisika peserta didik Kelas X MIA MAN 2 Model Makassar. JPPPF -Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 2(2), 39–46. Retrieved from http://journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/jpppf/article/view/55/381
Sakaki, M., Yagi, A., & Murayama, K. (2018). Curiosity in old age: A possible key to achieving adaptive aging. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 88, 106–116. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.03.007
Sanchez, C. A., & Weber, K. (2019). Using relevant animations to counter stereotype threat when learning science. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 8(4), 463–470. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2019.08.003
Shi, M. (2019). The effects of class size and instructional technology on student learning performance. International Journal of Management Education, 17(1), 130–138. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2019.01.004
Şimşek, P., & Kabapinar, F. (2010). The effects of inquiry-based learning on elementary students’ conceptual understanding of matter, scientific process skills and science attitudes. In Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 2, pp. 1190–1194). doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.170
Sitorus, J., & Masrayati. (2016). Students’ creative thinking process stages: Implementation of realistic mathematics education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 111–120. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.09.007
Suprihatiningrum, J. (2013). Strategi pembelajaran teori dan aplikasi. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media. Retrieved from https://scholar.google.com.ph/citations?user=hvZ-oYcAAAAJ&hl=en#d=gs_md_cita-d&u=%2Fcitations%3Fview_op%3Dview_citation%26hl%3Den%26user%3DhvZ-oYcAAAAJ%26citation_for_view%3DhvZ-oYcAAAAJ%3AL8Ckcad2t8MC%26tzom%3D-420
Timostsuk, I., & Jaanila, S. (2015). Primary teachers’ instructional behavior as related to students’ engagement in science learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 1597–1602. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.117
Tindangen, M. (2018). Inquiry-based learning model to improve higher order thinking skills. Asian Social Science, 14(7), 39–46. doi: https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v14n7p39
Tissenbaum, M. (2020). I see what you did there! Divergent collaboration and learner transitions from unproductive to productive states in open-ended inquiry. Computers and Education, 145. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103739
Trefil, J., & Hazen, R. M. (2016). The sciences : An integrated approach (8th ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Retrieved from https://www.wiley.com/en-us/The+Sciences%3A+An+Integrated+Approach%2C+8th+Edition-p-9781119049685
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. San Francisco, CA, US: Jossey-Bass. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2009-18745-000
Trna, J., Trnova, E., & Sibor, J. (2012). Implementation of inquiry-based science education in science teacher training. Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies, 2(4), 199–209. Retrieved from http://www.wjeis.org/FileUpload/ds217232/File/23.trna.pdf
Tursinawati. (2015). Analisis kemunculan sikap ilmiah siswa dalam pelaksanaan percobaan pada pembelajaran IPA di SDN Kota Banda Aceh. PIONIR: Jurnal Pendidikan, 4(1), 67–84. Retrieved from https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/Pionir/article/view/157/0
Uiterwijk-Luijk, L., Krüger, M., Zijlstra, B., & Volman, M. (2019). Teachers’ role in stimulating students’ inquiry habit of mind in primary schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102894
Veloo, A., Perumal, S., & Vikneswary, R. (2013). Inquiry-based instruction, students’ attitudes and teachers’ support towards science achievement in rural primary schools. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 65–69. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.153
Wang, H., Sui, Y., Luthans, F., Wang, D., & Wu, Y. (2014). Impact of authentic leadership on performance: Role of followers’ positive psychological capital and relational processes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(1), 5–21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1850
Wang, M., Wu, B., Kinshuk, Chen, N. S., & Spector, J. M. (2013). Connecting problem-solving and knowledge-construction processes in a visualization-based learning environment. Computers and Education, 68, 293–306. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.05.004
Wang, P.-H., Wu, P.-L., Yu, K.-W., & Lin, Y.-X. (2015). Influence of implementing inquiry-based instruction on science learning motivation and interest: A perspective of comparison. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 1292–1299. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.750
Wheeler, L. B., Maeng, J. L., & Whitworth, B. A. (2013). Understanding and structuring inquiry: A tale of three teachers. In NARST 2013 Annual International Conference (p. 29). Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3b8b/543f3c649c7ec98f3d061b4dedb9bf00b893.pdf?_ga=2.13020019.516094350.1577440788-396460436.1577440788
Widoyoko, S. E. P. (2013). Evaluasi program pembelajaran: Panduan praktis bagi pendidik dan calon pendidik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. Retrieved from http://library.um.ac.id/free-contents/index.php/buku/detail/evaluasi-program-pembelajaran-panduan-praktis-bagi-pendidik-dan-calon-pendidik-s-eko-putro-widoyoko-45347.html
Yap, W. L., Neo, M., & Neo, T. K. (2016). The impact of the role of teacher and balance of power in transforming conventional teaching to learner-centered teaching in Malaysian institution of higher education. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 24(4), 1849–1868. Retrieved from http://eprints.intimal.edu.my/710/1/The impact of the role of teacher and balance of power in transforming conventional teaching to learner-centered teaching in Malaysian institution of higher education.pdf
Yudarwati, G. A. (2019). Appreciative inquiry for community engagement in Indonesia rural communities. Public Relations Review, 45(4), 1-14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.101833
Yurkofsky, M. M., Blum-Smith, S., & Brennan, K. (2019). Expanding outcomes: Exploring varied conceptions of teacher learning in an online professional development experience. Teaching and Teacher Education, 82, 1–13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.03.002
Zabit, M. N. M. (2010). Problem-based learning on students’ critical thinking skills in teaching business education in Malaysia: A literature review. American Journal of Business Education, 3(6), 19–32. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1058610.pdf
Zendler, A., & Reile, S. (2018). The effect of reciprocal teaching and programmed instruction on learning outcome in computer science education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 58, 132–144. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.05.008
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in JPBI, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the publishing right to the publisher.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
