Complex Instruction Team Product (CITP) learning model: Improving student’s scientific attitudes and learning outcomes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v5i2.8367Keywords:
complex instruction, CITP learning model, learning outcome, scientific attitude, team productAbstract
Complex Instruction Team Product (CITP) learning model is one of the creative-innovative learning models which is assumed to be able to empower scientific attitudes and learning outcomes of students. This study aimed to determine students’ scientific attitudes and cognitive learning outcomes by implementing CITP learning model. This research used one-group pretest-posttest design. The sample was 18 tenth graders of academic year 2017/2018 of State Senior High School 6 of Ambon, Maluku Province. The data was analyzed using N-Gain test which then continued with dependent samples t-test. This result indicated that the highest achievement of students’ scientific attitudes were honesty and creativity (54). Meanwhile, the N-Gain score of students' cognitive learning outcomes was 0.61. In addition, the results of paired samples t-test show that there was a significant difference (p<0.05) between the students’ cognitive learning outcomes before and after the application of CITP learning model. This means that the application of CITP learning model can improve students’ scientific attitudes and cognitive learning outcomes.
Downloads
References
Archambault, J., Burch, T., Crofton, M., & Mcclure, A. (2008). The effects of developing kinematics concepts graphically prior to introducing algebraic problem solving techniques. Retrieved from http://modeling.asu.edu/modeling/Kinematics-graphical08brief.pdf
Awan, A. (2015). Peranan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe role playing menggunakan sistem pencernaan makanan pada manusia di Kelas XI IPA SMA Negeri 9 Kota Ambon. Biopendix: Jurnal Biologi, Pendidikan Dan Terapan, 1(2), 166–169. Retrieved from https://ejournal.unpatti.ac.id/ppr_iteminfo_lnk.php?id=1126
Ball, A., Joyce, H. D., & Anderson-Butcher, D. (2016). Exploring 21st century skills and learning environments for middle school youth. International Journal of School Social Work, 1(1), 1–15. doi: https://doi.org/10.4148/2161-4148.1012
Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2014). Defining twenty-first century skills. In Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5_2
Candrasekaran, S. (2014). Developing scientific attitude, critical thinking and creative intelligence of higher secondary school biology students by applying synectics techniques. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 3(6), 1–8. Retrieved from http://www.ijhssi.org/papers/v3(6)/Version-2/A03620108.pdf
Chu, S. K. W., Reynolds, R. B., Tavares, N. J., Notari, M., & Lee, C. W. Y. (2017). 21st Century skills development through inquiry-based learning. Singapore: Springer Singapore. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2481-8
Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4–58. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612453266
Erdogan, S. C. (2017). Science teaching attitudes and scientific attitudes of pre-service teachers of gifted students. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(6), 164–170. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1133039.pdf
Gardner, P. L. (1975). Attitudes to science : A review. Studies in Science Education, 2(1), 1–41. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267508559818
Gauld, C. F., & Hukins, A. A. (1980). Scientific attitudes: A review. Studies in Science Education, 7(1), 129–161. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057268008559877
Gunawan, A Harjono, H Sahidu, & Nisrina. (2018). Improving students’ creativity using cooperative learning with virtual media on static fluida concept. In International Conference on Science Education (ICoSEd) . IOP Publishing. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1006/1/012016
Hariyadi, S., Corebima, A. D., Zubaidah, S., & Ibrohim. (2018). Contribution of mind mapping, summarizing, and questioning in the RQA learning model to genetic learning outcomes. Journal of Turkish Science Education (TUSED), 15(1), 80–88. doi: https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10222a
Hayat, M. S., Anggraeni, S., & Redjeki, S. (2011). Pembelajaran berbasis praktikum pada konsep invertebrata untuk pengembangan sikap ilmiah siswa. Bioma: Jurnal Ilmiah Biologi, 1(2), 141–152. Retrieved from http://journal.upgris.ac.id/index.php/bioma/article/view/352/306
Husamah, & Pantiwati, Y. (2014). Cooperative learning STAD-PjBL: Motivation, thinking skills, and learning outcomes of Biology Department students. International Journal of Education Learning and Development, 2(1), 77–94. Retrieved from https://www.eajournals.org/journals/international-journal-of-education-learning-and-development-ijeld/vol-2-issue-1-march-2014/cooperative-learning-stad-pjbl-motivation-thinking-skills-learning-outcomes-biology-department-students/
Johanis, L. (2015). Penerapan strategi guided inquiry untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa Ambon konsep sistem pernapasan manusia Kelas XI SMA Negeri 12 Ambon. Biopendix : Jurnal Biologi, Pendidikan Dan Terapan, 1(2), 179–187. Retrieved from https://ojs3.unpatti.ac.id/index.php/biopendix/article/view/997
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2014). Cooperative learning in 21st century. Anales De Psicología / Annals of Psychology, 30(3), 841–851. doi: https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.201241
Kristiani, N., Susilo, H., Rohman, F., & Corebima Aloysius, D. (2015). The contribution of students’ metacognitive skills and scientific attitude towards their academic achievements in biology learning implementing Thinking Empowerment by Questioning (TEQ) learning integrated with inquiry learning (TEQI). International Journal of Educational Policy Research and Review, 2(9), 113–120. doi: https://doi.org/10.15739/IJEPRR.020
Lacap, M. P. (2015). The scientific attitudes of students major in science in the new teacher education curriculum. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 3(5), 7–15. Retrieved from http://www.apjmr.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/APJMR-2015-3.5.3.02.pdf
Leasa, M., & Corebima, A. D. (2017). The effect of numbered heads together (NHT) cooperative learning model on the cognitive achievement of students with different academic ability. In J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. (Vol. 795, pp. 1–9). IOP Publishing. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/795/1/012071
Lestari, P., Wardani, S., & Sumarti, S. S. (2018). Influence of Guided Inquiry Model on students cognitive learning outcome in stoichiometry topic. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 7(2), 130–135. doi: https://doi.org/10.15294/JISE.V7I2.23853
Listiana, L., Susilo, H., Suwono, H., & Suarsini, E. (2016). Contributions of metacognitive skills toward students’ cognitive abilities of biology through the implementation of GITTW (Group Investigation combined with Think Talk Write) strategy. In Proceeding of International Conference on Teacher Training and Education (ICTTE) FKIP UNS 2015 (Vol. 1, pp. 411–418). FKIP Universitas Sebelas Maret. Retrieved from https://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id/index.php/ictte/article/view/7638
Marchis, I. (2011). Factors that influence secondary school students’ attitude to mathematics. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 786–793. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.306
Meltzer, D. E. (2002). The relationship between mathematics preparation and conceptual learning gains in physics: A possible “‘hidden variable’” in diagnostic pretest scores. Am. J. Pyhs., 70(12), 1259–1268. doi: https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1514215
Mujtaba, T., Sheldrake, R., Reiss, M. J., & Simon, S. (2018). Students’ science attitudes, beliefs, and context: associations with science and chemistry aspirations. International Journal of Science Education, 40(6), 644–667. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1433896
Papanastasiou, C., & Papanastasiou, E. C. (2004). Major influences on attitudes toward science. Educational Research and Evaluation, 10(3), 239–257. doi: https://doi.org/10.1076/edre.10.3.239.30267
Pescarmona, I. (2014). Learning to participate through Complex Instruction. Intercultural Education, 25(3), 187–196. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2014.905360
Pescarmona, I. (2017). Reflexivity-in-action: How complex instruction can work for equity in the classroom. Journal of Education for Teaching, 43(3), 328–337. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2017.1319508
PISA. (2015). Draft science framework. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/Draft PISA 2015 Science Framework .pdf
Pitafi, A. I., & Farooq, M. (2012). Measurement of scientific attitude of secondary school students in Pakistan. Academic Research International, 2(2), 379–392. Retrieved from www.savap.org.pkwww.journals.savap.org.pk
Potvin, P., & Hasni, A. (2014). Interest, motivation and attitude towards science and technology at K-12 levels: a systematic review of 12 years of educational research. Studies in Science Education, 50(1), 85–129. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2014.881626
Prayekti. (2018). The influence of cognitive learning style and learning independence on the students’ learning outcomes. Higher Education Studies, 8(2), 37–46. doi: https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v8n2p37
Ramdiah, S., & Corebima, A. D. (2014). Learning strategy equalizing students’ achievement, metacognitive, and critical thinking skills. American Journal of Educational Research, 2(8), 577–584. doi: https://doi.org/10.12691/education-2-8-3
Rumahlatu, D., & Sangur, K. (2017). Implementation of project-based learning strategies to improve metacognitive skills and understanding of biodiversity concepts in State High School 2 Kairatu, West District of Seram. In Proceeding the 2nd International Seminar on Education (Vol. 1, pp. 43–48). Ambon. Retrieved from https://ojs.unpatti.ac.id/index.php/ises/article/view/127
Samosir, F. S., & Silitonga, M. (2014). Penerapan pembelajaran kooperatif tipe pengajaran kompleks (Complex Intruction) dalam pembelajaran kompetensi menganalisis rangkaian kemagnetan. Universitas Negeri Medan. Retrieved from http://digilib.unimed.ac.id/1052/3/FullText.pdf
Sharma, U. (2016). A comparative study of scientific attitude of science and non-science B.T.C. pupil teachers. International Journal of Applied Research, 2(6), 612–615. Retrieved from http://www.allresearchjournal.com/archives/2016/vol2issue6/PartJ/2-5-17-944.pdf
Takeda, I. (2016). Report: Project-based learning with 21st century skills for the Japanese language classroom. Journal of Integrated Creative Studies. Retrieved from http://www2.yukawa.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~future/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/2016-020-e.pdf
Tombak, B., & Altun, S. (2016). The effect of cooperative learning: University example. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, (64), 173–196. doi: https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2016.64.10
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. San Francisco, CA, US: Jossey-Bass. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2009-18745-000
Ünal, C., & Özdemir, Ö. F. (2013). A physics laboratory course designed using problem-based learning for prospective physics teachers. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1(1), 29–33. Retrieved from http://www.acarindex.com/dosyalar/makale/acarindex-1423880574.pdf
Wagner, T. (2016). The Global Achievement Gap. Retrieved August 2, 2019, from https://education.uky.edu/nxgla/wp-content/uploads/sites/33/2016/11/The-Global-Achievement-Gap-7-Survival-Skills-.pdf
Widiadnyana, I. W., Sadia, I. W., & Suastra, I. W. (2014). Pengaruh model discovery learning terhadap pemahaman konsep IPA dan sikap ilmiah siswa SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran IPA Indonesia, 4(1), 1–13. Retrieved from http://oldpasca.undiksha.ac.id/e-journal/index.php/jurnal_ipa/article/view/1344/1036
Wijaya, E. Y., Sudjimat, D. A., & Nyoto, A. (2016). Transformasi pendidikan Abad 21 sebagai tuntutan pengembangan sumber daya manusia di Era Global. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika 2016 (Vol. 1, pp. 263–278). Malang: Universitas Kanjuruhan Malang. Retrieved from http://repository.unikama.ac.id/840/32/263-278 TRANSFORMASI PENDIDIKAN ABAD 21 SEBAGAI TUNTUTAN PENGEMBANGAN SUMBER DAYA MANUSIA DI ERA GLOBAL.pdf
Yaqin, M. A., Indriwati, S. E., & Susilo, H. (2018). Think-pair-square learning: Improving student’s collaborative skills and cognitive learning outcome on animal diversity course. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 4(2), 135–142. doi: https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v4i2.5514
Zubaidah, S. (2016). Keterampilan abad ke-21: Keterampilan yang diajarkan melalui pembelajaran. In Seminar Nasional Pendidikan dengan tema “Isu-Isu Strategis Pembelajaran MIPA Abad 21" (pp. 1–17). Sintang-Kalimantan Barat: Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi STKIP Persada Khatulistiwa. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318013627_KETERAMPILAN_ABAD_KE-21_KETERAMPILAN_YANG_DIAJARKAN_MELALUI_PEMBELAJARAN
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in JPBI, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the publishing right to the publisher.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
