Competency-based English language teaching through Microsoft teams: A framework for adaptation and integration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/englie.v5i2.33323Keywords:
Competency-Based English Language Teaching, Microsoft Teams, Adaptation, Integration, Mixed MethodAbstract
This paper addresses the challenge of implementing Competency-Based English Language Teaching (CBELT) within the digital realm, specifically through the utilization of the Microsoft Teams platform. The methodology employed Mix-method with incorporating exploratory sequential design. Qualitative data from the interviews will be analyzed using thematic analysis to identify recurring patterns, themes, and key considerations for implementing CBELT in Microsoft Teams. Surveys assessed pedagogical and technical efficacy in descriptive statistics and correlation analysis in the quantitative phase. The finding of the research exposed that Educators emphasized leveraging Microsoft Teams' features like chat, video conferencing, and file sharing to deliver CBE content effectively. With a mean score of 4.49, most respondents were satisfied with CBE integration with Microsoft Teams. This suggests the platform's CBE integration is well-received. Respondents reported a mean score of 6.23 for language proficiency development with Microsoft Teams CBE. Microsoft Teams is simple to use, according to respondents, with a mean score of 6.62. A moderate positive association exists between project-based learning intensity and competence development results (r = 0.664, p < 0.05). This shows that increasing project-based learning intensity improves student proficiency. A moderate positive association exists between integrating collaborative activities and engagement indicators (r = 0.657, p < 0.05). This suggests that Microsoft Teams collaborative activities boost student engagement during Competency-Based English Language Teaching (CBELT). Project-based learning, collaborative activities, and customised teaching help CBE succeed. These tactics allow students to actively learn, contribute, and get individualised teaching.
Downloads
References
Al-Qora’n, L., Salem, O. A. S., & Gordon, N. (2022). Heuristic evaluation of microsoft teams as an online teaching platform: An educators’ perspective. Computers, 11(12), 175. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers11120175
Alshuraiaan, A. (2023). Exploring the relationship between teacher-student interaction patterns and language learning outcomes in TESOL classrooms. Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 5(3), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.32996/jeltal.2023.5.3.3
Baker, L. A., & Spencely, C. (2020). Blending microsoft teams with existing teaching environments to increase access, inclusivity and engagement. Journal of the Foundation Year Network, 3, 3–20. retrieved from https://jfyn.co.uk/index.php/ukfyn/article/view/58
Bakonyi, V., Illés, Z., & Szabó, T. (2022). Real-time interaction tools in virtual classroom systems. In Recent Innovations in Computing: Proceedings of ICRIC 2021, Volume 2 (pp. 625–636). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8892-8_47
Cañadas, L. (2021). Contribution of formative assessment for developing teaching competences in teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 46(3), 516–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2021.1950684.
Cenoz, J., & Gorter, D. (2020). Teaching English through pedagogical translanguaging. World Englishes, 39(2), 300–311. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12462.
Chaka, C., Nkhobo, T., & Lephalala, M. (2022). Leveraging student engagement through ms teams at an open and distance e-learning institution. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 9(3), 136–146. https://doi.org/10.20448/jeelr.v9i3.4102
Delane, R. (2023). Opportunities for competency-based learning in software development courses. [Doctoral Dissertation the Pennsylvania State University]. https://etda.libraries.psu.edu/catalog/29852rjd5247
Doush, I. A., Al-Jarrah, A., Alajarmeh, N., & Alnfiai, M. (2022). Learning features and accessibility limitations of video conferencing applications: Are people with visual impairment left behind. Universal Access in the Information Society, 22(4), 1353–1368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-022-00917-4
Egbert, J. L., & Shahrokni, S. A. (2019). Balancing old and new: Integrating competency-based learning into CALL teacher education. The JALT CALL Journal, 15(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v15n1.156
Eristi, B., & Polat, M. (2017). The effectiveness of Synectic instructional model on foreign language vocabulary teaching. International Journal of Languages’ Education, 5(2), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.18298/ijlet.1753
García-Morales, V. J., Garrido-Moreno, A., & Martín-Rojas, R. (2021). The transformation of higher education after the Covid disruption: Emerging challenges in an online learning scenario. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.616059
Heritage, M., Walqui, A., & Linquanti, R. (2020). English language learners and the new standards: Developing language, content knowledge, and analytical practices in the classroom. Harvard Education Press.
Ho, T. T. H., Le, V. H., Nguyen, D. T., Nguyen, C. T. P., & Nguyen, H. T. T. (2023). Effects of career development learning on students’ perceived employability: A longitudinal study. Higher Education, 86(2), 297–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00933-6
Hubbard, M., Bailey, M. J., Hess, D., & Hellebro, M. (2021). Mastering microsoft teams. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-6898-8
Hung, J.-F., & Tsai, C.-Y. (2020). The effects of a virtual laboratory and metacognitive scaffolding on students’ data modeling competences. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(6), 923–939. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.923
Kazumyan, I., & Eragamreddy, N. (2024). Using blendi approach to improve the EFL students’ language skills. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 39–54. https://doi.org/10.22190/jtesap231013004k
Kharkivska, A. (2020). The competency-based approach as methodology of professional training of future teachers in the conditions of education informatization. Problems of Engineer-Pedagogical Education, 67, 27–35. https://doi.org/10.32820/2074-8922-2020-67-27-35
Kiger, M. E., & Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Medical Teacher, 42(8), 846–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030
Lin, T.-Y., & Tiao, W.-J. (2022). Promoting competency-based language teaching through the application of multimodal materials. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 86–92. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijlt.8.2.86-92
Matitaputty, C., Nusantara, T., Hidayanto, E., & Sukoriyanto. (2024). How mathematics teachers’ special knowledge changing: A case study in the Professional Teacher Education program. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(2), 545–574. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i2.pp545-574
McCallum, L. (2023). New takes on developing intercultural communicative competence: Using AI tools in telecollaboration task design and task completion. Journal for Multicultural Education, 18(1/2), 153–172. https://doi.org/10.1108/jme-06-2023-0043
Meenambal, D. S., & Meenakshi, S. (2022). The effectiveness of communication strategies to develop the communicative competency of ESL learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12(10), 1961–1968. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1210.02
Moorhouse, B. L., Li, Y., & Walsh, S. (2021). E-classroom interactional competencies: mediating and assisting language learning during synchronous online lessons. RELC Journal, 54(1), 114–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220985274
Moldasan, K. (2023). Competency-based approach to learning is a new trend in education. Journal of Educational Sciences, 76(3). https://doi.org/10.26577/jes.2023.v76.i3.013
Munna, A. S., & Kalam, M. A. (2021). Teaching and learning process to enhance teaching effectiveness: Literature review. International Journal of Humanities and Innovation (IJHI), 4(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.33750/ijhi.v4i1.102
Muthuswamy, V. V., Akilandeswari, S. (2023). Navigating work stress and cultural competency: Linguistic challenges, host country language ability, and difficulty as key influences. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(2), 212-227. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.32601/ejal.902018
Nair, P. K., & Fahimirad, M. (2019). A qualitative research study on the importance of life skills on undergraduate students’ personal and social competencies. International Journal of Higher Education, 8(5), 71-83. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v8n5p71.
Ngoc, T. P., & Phung, L. T. K. (2021). Online language learning via Moodle and Microsoft teams: students’ challenges and suggestions for improvement. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference of the Asia Association of Computer-Assisted Language Learning (AsiaCALL 2021). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210226.013
Narayn, H. (2023). Teams and Power Virtual Agents. In: Building the Modern Workplace with SharePoint Online. Apress, Berkeley, CA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-9726-1_8.
Năstase, A. G. (2020). Autonomy and technology in language learning: Opportunities and limitations of online language exchanges. [Doctoral dissertation, Università degli Studi di Padova] http://tesi.cab.unipd.it/64361/1/Andra_Gabriela_Nastase_2020.pdf
Pal, D., & Vanijja, V. (2020a). Perceived usability evaluation of Microsoft Teams as an online learning platform during COVID-19 using system usability scale and technology acceptance model in India. Children and Youth Services Review, 119, 105535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105535
Pal, D., & Vanijja, V. (2020b). Perceived usability evaluation of Microsoft Teams as an online learning platform during COVID-19 using system usability scale and technology acceptance model in India. Children and Youth Services Review, 119, 105535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105535
Portuguez Castro, M., & Gómez Zermeño, M. G. (2020). Challenge based learning: Innovative pedagogy for sustainability through e-learning in higher education. Sustainability, 12(10), 4063. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104063
Purpura, J. E. (2021). A Rationale for using a scenario-based assessment to measure competency-based, situated second and foreign language proficiency. In Monica Masperi, Cristiana Cervini Yves Bardieri (eds.) Evaluation des acquisitions langagieres: du formatif au certificatif. mediAzioni 32:A54-A96. http://www,mediazoni.sitlec.unibo.it.
Radia, B. (2019). Approaching a reading course via moodle-based blended learning: EFL learners’ insights. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods (MJLTM), 9(11), 0. http://dx.doi.org/10.26655/mjltm.2019.11.1
Red’ko, V., Sorokina, N., Smovzhenko, L., Onats, O., & Chyzhevski, B. (2023). Situational foreign language instruction in competency-based learning framework: Ukrainian experience. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(5), 637–657. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.5.33
Rojabi, A. R. (2020). Exploring efl students’ perception of online learning via Microsoft teams: university level in Indonesia. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 3(2), 163-173. https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v3i2.2349
Rose, H., Curle, S., Aizawa, I., & Thompson, G. (2019). What drives success in English medium taught courses? The interplay between language proficiency, academic skills, and motivation. Studies in Higher Education, 45(11), 2149–2161. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1590690
Saint, M. (2021.). Development of a curriculum based on content and language integrated learning and competency-based education for enhancing business English writing ability of undergraduate students. [Doctoral dissertation, Chulalongkorn University] https://doi.org/10.58837/chula.the.2021.123
Scoular, S., Huntsberry, A., Patel, T., Wettergreen, S., & Brunner, J. M. (2021). Transitioning competency-based communication assessments to the online platform: Examples and student outcomes. Pharmacy, 9(1), 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy9010052
Shtaltovna, Y., & Muzzu, C. (2021). Enhancing students’ digital competencies within the Employability module of the University of Europe’s skills-based curricula. Proceedings of the First GiLE4Youth International Conference: The Development of Competencies for Employability, 71–89. https://doi.org/10.56611/conf.proc.2021.1.71-89
Sinlapaninman, U., & Pattanachai, N. (2022a). Enhancing pre-service computer teachers’ online teaching ability through blended distance learning with competency-based classroom simulation activities. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 9(3), 1145–1155. https://iojet.org/index.php/IOJET/article/view/1678
Sinlapaninman, U., & Pattanachai, N. (2022b). Enhancing pre-service computer teachers’ online teaching ability through blended distance learning with competency-based classroom simulation activities. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 9(3), 1145–1155. https://iojet.org/index.php/IOJET/article/view/1678
Sobaih, A. E. E., Salem, A. E., Hasanein, A. M., & Elnasr, A. E. A. (2021). Responses to COVID-19 in higher education: students’ learning experience using Microsoft teams versus social network sites. Sustainability, 13(18), 10036. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810036
Taherdoost, H. (2022). What are different research approaches? Comprehensive review of qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method research, their applications, types, and limitations. Journal of Management Science & Engineering Research, 5(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.30564/jmser.v5i1.4538
Transinata, T. (2022). A new challenge: The reconstruction of online language laboratory on distance learning. Educational Challenges, 27(1), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.34142/2709-7986.2022.27.1.03
Vail, T. (2019). Self‐paced English as a foreign language in a Competency based education program for Korean learners. The Journal of Competency‐Based Education, 4(3), e01195. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbe2.1195
Vivek, R., & Nanthagopan, Y. (2021). Review and comparison of multi-method and mixed method application in research studies. European Journal of Management Issues, 29(4), 200–208. https://doi.org/10.15421/192119.
Zhai, X., Fang, Q., Dong, Y., Wei, Z., Yuan, J., Cacciolatti, L., & Yang, Y. (2018). The effects of biofeedback‐based stimulated recall on self‐regulated online learning: A gender and cognitive taxonomy perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(6), 775–786. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12284
Zhao, X., & McClure, C. D. (2022). Gather. Town: A gamification tool to promote engagement and establish online learning communities for language learners. RELC Journal, 55(1), https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882221097216
Zuraini, Misnawati & Nofriati, E. (2021). Empowering speaking skill through Microsoft office 365 as a learning medium during a pandemic Covid 19. The 1st International Conference on Research in Social Sciences and Humanities (ICoRSH 2020), 487–491. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211102.062
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Prasetya, R. E.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with English Learning Innovation (englie) agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in English Learning Innovation (englie), copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the publishing right to the publisher.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1.png){kind=logo}
