The Contextual Origin of Ibn Taymiyyah's Thought on Jihad

Authors

  • Hamdan Maghribi UIN Raden Mas Said Surakarta, Indonesia
  • Abbas Sofwan Matlail Fajar Universitas Islam Tribakti Lirboyo Kediri, Indonesia
  • Alfina Hidayah UIN Raden Mas Said Surakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/progresiva.v12i01.25062

Keywords:

Ibn Taimiyyah, Jihad Fatwa, Jihadist, Radical, Moderate

Abstract

Since the 1980s until today, Aḥmad ibn Taimiyyah (d. 1328) has been one of the most quoted medieval scholars by jihadists. From ‘Abd al-Salām Faraj (d. 1981) to Osama bin Laden and his al-Qaeda. Ibn Taimiyyah is frequently cited to justify their doctrine. Ibn Taimiyyah’s fatwa is used to declare a legitimate leader of a country an apostate for not fully implementing the shari’ah and obligating every Muslim to jihād against him, classifying war zones (dār al-ḥarb) and requiring emigration (hijrah) from them, and permitting suicide bombings in the name of jihād. This article examines jihadists’ understanding of jihād as well as Ibn Taimiyyah’s jihād fatwas, specifically the three anti-Mongol fatwas and the Mardin fatwa, which are frequently cited by jihadists. This article addresses two major issues: first, it discusses Ibn Taimiyyah’s three anti-Mongol fatwas, as well as their citation and interpretation in jihadist fatwas; second, it examines the Mardin fatwa, which is always used as justification for jihad against the legitimate government. The article finds that some of the radicalists’ jihād doctrines quote directly from Ibn Taimiyyah’s jihād fatwas, particularly the three anti-Mongol fatwas and the Mardin fatwa, but most of the fatwas cannot be associated with Ibn Taimiyyah when approached holistically. The article also notes that Ibn Taimiyyah’s jihād doctrine is only partially quoted and ignores the majority of fatwas that are closely related to the theme of jihād, such as the concepts of hijrah and critical loyalty to the government. This article also identifies Ibn Taimiyyah’s jihād fatwas as being more frequently cited to legalize the interests of jihadist groups in justifying their acts of terror while ignoring the historical and political contexts that surround them.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

‘Awīs, M. M. (1970). Ibn Taimiyyah laisa Salafiyyan. Dār al-Nahḍah al-‘Arabiyyah.

Abou Fadl, K. (2001). Rebellion and Violence in Islamic Law. Cambridge University Press.

Adams, C. C. (1968). Islam and Modernism in Egypt : a Study of the Modern Reform Movement Inaugurated by Muhammad `Abduh. Russell & Russell.

Aigle, D. (2007). The Mongol Invasions of Bilād Al-Shām by Ghāzān Khān and Ibn Taymīyah’s Three “Anti-Mongol” Fatwas. Mamlūk Studies Review, 11(2), 89–120.

Aigle, D. (2014). A Religious Response to Ghazan Khan’s Invasions of Syria. The Three “Anti-Mongol” fatwās of Ibn Taymiyya. In The Mongol Empire between Myth and Reality (pp. 283–305). Brill.

Aigle, D. (2015). A Religious Response to Ghazan Khan’s Invasions of Syria: The Three ‘Anti-Mongol’ Fatwas of Ibn Taymiyya. In The Mongol Empire between Myth and Reality: Studies in Anthropological History (pp. 283–305). Brill.

Al-Barīdī, ‘Abd Allāh. (2021). Ibn Taimiyyah Failasūf al-Fiṭrah: Naḥwa Kabsalah al-Failasūf. Dār Aṡar.

Al-Marzūqī, A. Y. (1996). Iṣlāḥ al-‘Aql fi al-Falsafah al-‘Arabiyyah: min Wāqi‘iyyah Arisṭū wa Aflāṭūn ilā Ismiyyah Ibn Taimiyyah wa Ibn Khaldūn (2nd ed.). Markaz Dirāsāt al-Waḥdah al-‘Arabiyyah.

Al-Qaraḍāwī, Y. (n.d.). Fiqh al-jihād: Dirāsah Muqāranah liaḥkāmihi wa Flsafatihi fī ḍau’ al- Qur’ān wa al-Sunnah. Maṭba‘ah al-Madanī.

Amitai, R. (2004). The Mongol Occupation of Damascus in 1300: A Study of Mamluk Loyalties. In A. Levanoni & M. Winter (Eds.), The Mamluks in Egyptian and Syrian Politics and Society (pp. 21–41). Brill.

Berkey, J. P. (2003). The Formation of Islam: Religion and Society in the Near East, 600-1800. Cambridge University Press.

Commins, D. (1990). Islamic Reform: Politics and Social Change in Late Ottoman Syria. Oxford University Press.

Dr. Fadl, ‘Abd al-Qādir bin ‘Abd Al-‘Azīz. (2009). Al-‘Umdah fī I‘dād al-‘Uddah li al-Jihād fī Sabīl Allāh: Rambu-Rambu Jihad. Syam Publishing.

El-Rouayheb, K. (n.d.). From Ibn Ḥajar al-Haytamī (d. 1566) to Khayr al-Dīn al-Ālūsī (d. 1899): Changing Views of Ibn Taymiyya among non-Ḥanbalī Sunni Scholars. In Times (pp. 269–318).

Farrukh, O. A. (1966). Ibn Taimiyya on Public and Private Law in Islam. Khayat.

Fuchs, S. W. (2013). Do Excellent Surgeons Make Miserable Exegetes? Negotiating the Sunni Tradition in the Jihādī Camps. Welt Des Islams, 53(2), 192–237.

Graf, B., & Skovgaard-Petersen, J. (2009). Global mufti : the phenomenon of Yusuf al-Qaradawi. Columbia University Press.

Gwynne, R. W. (2006). Usama bin Ladin, the Qur’an and Jihad. Religion, 36(2), 61–90.

Harās, M. K. (1952). Ibn Taimiyyah al-Salafī. Al-Maṭba‘ah al-Yūsūfiyyah.

Hassan, H. (2015, January). The Secret World of ISIS Training Camps Ruled by Sacred Texts and the Sword. The Guardian.

Hassan, M. (2010). Modern Interpretations and Misinterpretations of a Medieval Scholar: Apprehending the Political Thought of Ibn Taymiyya. In Times (pp. 338–366).

Haykel, B. (2003). Revival and Reform in Islam : the Legacy of Muhammad al-Shawkani. Cambridge University Press.

Hidayah, A., & Maghribi, H. (2022). The Misinterpretation of Ibn Taymiyyah’s Mardin Fatwa by the Modern Jihadist. Fikrah: Jurnal Ilmu Aqidah Dan Studi Keagamaan, 10(02). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/fikrah.v10i2.16961

Hoover, J. (2007). Ibn Taymiyya’s Theodicy of Perpetual Optimism. Brill.

Hoover, J. (2016). Ibn Taymiyya between Moderation and Radicalism. In E. Kendall & A. Khan (Eds.), Reclaiming Islamic Tradition: Modern Interpretations of the Classical Heritage (pp. 177–203). Edinburgh University Press.

Hoover, J. (2018). Reconciling Ibn Taymiyya’s Legitimisation of Violence with His Vision of Universal Salvation. In R. Gleave & I. T. Kristo-Nagy (Eds.), Violence in Islamic Thought from the Mongols to European Imperialism (pp. 107–116). Edinburgh University Press.

Hoover, J. (2020). Ibn Taymiyya: Makers of The Muslim World. Oneworld Academic.

Ibn Taimiyyah, A. ibn ’Abd al Ḥalīm. (2002). Qā‘idah fī al-Inghimās fī al-‘Aduww wa Hal Yubāḥ Fīhā? (Abū Muḥammad Asyraf bin ‘Abd Al-Maqṣūd (Ed.)). Aḍwā’ Al-Salaf.

Ibn Taimiyyah, A. ibn ’Abd al Ḥalīm. (2004). Majmū’ Fatāwā Syaikh al-Islām Aḥmad ibn Taimiyyah (‘Abd al-Raḥmān ibn Muḥammad Ibn Qāsim & M. ibn ‘Abd al-R. ibn M. Ibn Qāsim (Eds.)). Maṭābi‘ al-Riyāḍ.

Ibn Taimiyyah, A. ibn ’Abd al Ḥalīm, & Michot, Y. (2017). Ibn Taimiyyah ḍidda al-Taṭarruf. Markaz Dalāil.

Jād al-Ḥaqq, J. al-Ḥaqq ‘Alī. (1997). Kutaib al-Farīḍah al-Ghāʾibah wa al-radd ʿalaih. In Al-Fatāwā al-Islāmiyyah min Dār al-Iftā’ al-Miṣriyyah. Wizārat alawqāf.

Jansen, J. J. G. (1986). The Neglected Duty : The Creed of Sadat’s Assassins and Islamic Resurgence in the Middle East (M. `Abd al-S. F. al-ghaibah Faraj (Ed.)). Macmillan.

Kean, T., & Hamilton, L. (2004). The 9/11 Commission Report: Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks upon the United States. W.W. Norton & Company.

Laoust, H. (1939). Essai sur les doctrines sociales et politiques de Takī-d-Dīn Ahmad b. Taimīya: canoniste ḥanbalite, né à Harrān en 661/1262, mort à Damas en 728/1328. In Recherches d’archéologie, de philologie et d’histoire (Vol. 10, Issue 10). l’Institut français d’archéologie orientale.

Maghribi, H. (2022). Rekonstruksi Taṣawuf Ibn Taimiyyah: Tinjauan Epistemologis. UIN Walisongo Semarang.

Maghribi, H., Hidayah, A., & Arikhah. (2022). Ibn Taimiyyah dan Rancang Bangun Taṣawuf Salafi. Esoterik: Jurnal Akhlak Dan Tasawuf, 08(02), 193–216. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/esoterik.v8i2.16509

Maihula, J. S. (2021). Ibn Taymiyya in the Literature of Contemporary Jihadists. Dār al-Ghad al-Jadīd.

Mandaville, P. (Ed.). (2022). Wahhabism and the World: Understanding Saudi Arabia’s Global Influence on Islam. Oxford University Press.

March, A. F. (2009). Islam and Liberal Citizenship: The Search for an Overlapping Consensus. Oxford University Press.

Meijer, R. (2013). Global Salafism: Islam’s new religious movement. Oxford University Press, USA.

Michot, Y. (1995). Ibn Taymiyya: Lettre a Un Roi Croisé (Al-Risâlat Al-Qubruṣiyya. Bruylant-Academia.

Michot, Y. (2006). Ibn Taymiyya: Muslims under Non-Muslim Rule. Interface Publications.

Michot, Y. (2011). Ibn Taymiyya’s “New Mardin Fatwa”. Is genetically modified Islam (GMI) carcinogenic? The Muslim World, 101(2), 130–181.

Michot, Y. (2012). Ibn Taymiyya: Against Extremisms. Albouraq.

Michot, Y. (2020). Étude Taymiyennes: Taymiyyan Studies. Albouraq.

Michot, Y., & Ibn Taimiyyah, A. ibn ’Abd al Ḥalīm. (2012). Against Extremisms. Beirut: Albouraq Editions.

Molloy, R. (2009). Deconstructing Ibn Taymiyya’s views on suicidal missions. CTC Sentinel, 2(3).

Morgan, D. (2005). The “Great Yasa of Chinggis Khan” Revisited (pp. 291–308). Brill.

Nasīrah, H. (2015). Matāhah al-Ḥākimiyyah Akhṭā’ al-Jihādiyyin fī Fahmi Ibn Taimiyyah. Markaz Dirāsāt al-Waḥdah al-‘Arabiyyah.

Nizami, K. A. (1990). The Impact of Ibn Taymiyya on South Asia. Journal of Islamic Studies, 1, 120–149.

Patric, F. (2016, March). Review of What do Islamist extremists believe? Salafi-Jihadism” by Shiraz Maher and “Crusade and Jihad” by Malcolm Lambert. The Guardian.

Preckel, C. (n.d.). Screening Ṣiddīq Ḥasan Khān’s Library: The Use of Ḥanbalī Literature in 19th-Century Bhopal. In Debating (pp. 162–219).

Rahman, F. (2000). Revival and Reform in Islam: A Study of Islamic Fundamentalism. Oneworld.

Riexinger, M. (2013). Ibn Taymiyya’s Worldview and the Challenge of Modernity. In Islamic Theology, Philosophy and Law (pp. 493–518). DE GRUYTER. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110285406.493

Schallenbergh, G. (2007). Ibn Taymīya (d. 1328) on Chess: Legal Evidence for a Prohibition. Egypt and Syria in the Fatimid, Ayyubid and Mamluk Eras V, Proceedings of the 11th, 12th and 13th International Colloquium, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, May 2002, 2003 and 2004, D(ulster), 525–537.

Sivan, E. (1983). Ibn Taymiyya: Father of the Islamic Revolution: Medieval Theology & Modern Politics. Encounter, 60(5), 41–50.

Vasalou, S. (2016). Ibn Taymiyya’s Theological Ethics. Oxford University Press.

Wagemakers, J. (2012). A Quietist Jihadi: The Ideology and Influence of Abu Muhammad al-Maqdisi. Cambridge University Press.

Wehrey, F., & Boukhars, A. (2019). Defining Salafism. In Salafism in the Maghreb (pp. 5–18). Oxford University Press.

Weismann, I. (2000). Taste of Modernity: Sufism, Salafiyya, and Arabism in Late Ottoman Damascus. Brill.

Weismann, I. (2009). Genealogies of Fundamentalism: Salafi Discourse in Nineteenth-Century Baghdad. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 36(2), 267–280.

Weismann, I. (2021). New and Old Perspectives in the Study of Salafism. Bustan: The Middle East Book Review, 8(1), 22–37.

Wiktorowicz, Q. (2005). A Genealogy of Radical Islam. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 28(2), 75–97.

Zaman, M. Q. (2012). Modern Islamic Thought in a Radical Age: Religious Authority and Internal Criticism. Cambridge University Press.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-05

How to Cite

Maghribi, H., Matlail Fajar, A. S., & Hidayah, A. (2023). The Contextual Origin of Ibn Taymiyyah’s Thought on Jihad. Progresiva : Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Pendidikan Islam, 12(01), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.22219/progresiva.v12i01.25062