The Construction of Educational Interaction Models in Pesantren and Its Relevance to Contemporary Islamic Education

Authors

  • Ahmad Mahfudzi Mafrudlo Doctoral Programme on Islamic Law, Islamic State University of Sunan Gunung Djati, Bandung Indonesia
  • Zuhratul Aini Mansur Faculty of Industrial and Information Engineering, University of Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. Hamka, Indonesia
  • Ghilmanul Wasath Faculty of Dirasat Islamiyah, Islamic State Univeristy of Syarif Hidayatullah, Jakarta Indonesia
  • Muhammad Ersyad Muttaqien Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, University of Pasundan, Bandung Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/progresiva.v12i01.27896

Keywords:

Pesantren, Islamic and moral education., Model, Islamic education institution

Abstract

This paper aims to elaborate on the significance of educational interaction in Islamic Education institutions known as Pesantren. As in the Islamic Education in Indonesia that applied integration between technological developments, educational interaction, and educational transformation. It's just that the values of the implementation process of this integration cause discontinuity between interaction and transformation of knowledge. The essence of the significance of the Islamic Education model in the Pesantren needs to be revitalized, it is very relevant to how the process and dynamics of Islamic Education in the modern era. The educational interaction model applied in Pesantren is a reference and guideline for all parties and educational institutions and is important to be constructed in order to obtain proportional and comprehensive Islamic Education. This research was initiated for contributive things and is a type of library research. The Study employed a qualitative study design to capture a real-life context of the Islamic education of Pesantren in playing its role. Finally, it will find various opinions and perspectives from authors who explain and review the existence of Islamic Education institutions that have implemented educational interactions. The finding revealed that the pattern of educational interaction carried out in pesantren focuses on two things: educational interaction in daily activities and educational interaction in the system. The model of implementing educational interaction is comprehensively understood by all parties in the pesantren so that the reality of Islamic education is formed for the shake of the sustainability of the education process.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Zuhratul Aini Mansur, Faculty of Industrial and Information Engineering, University of Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. Hamka, Indonesia

 

 

Muhammad Ersyad Muttaqien, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, University of Pasundan, Bandung Indonesia

 

 

References

A. Qodri Azizy. (2004). Melawan Globalisasi Reinterpretasi Ajaran Islam. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

A.M, S. (2014). Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. jakarta: Rajawali Press.

A.Steenbrink, K. (1974). Pesantren, Madrasah, Sekolah: Pendidikan Islam Dalam Kurun Modern. Jakarta: LP3ES.

Abbas Hidayat, S. F. &Didin N. R. (2022). Challenge and Prospects of Islamic Education Institutions and Sustainability. Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 5(2), 351–366. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31538/nzh.v5i2.2106

Abd. Halim Soebahar. (2013). Kebijakan Pendidikan Islam dari Ordonansi Guru Sampai UU Sisdiknas. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Abu Muhammad Iqbal. (2015). Pemikiran Pendidikan Islam: Gagasan-gagasan Besar Para Ilmuwan Muslim. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Al-Attas, S. M. N. (1979). Aims and Objectives of Education. Jeddah: King Abdul Azis University.

Amin, A. (2019). Hubungan Kompetensi Sosial Guru Dengan Interaksi Edukatif Dalam Perspektif Peserta Didik. Al-Bidayah: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Islam, 11(01), 77–106. https://doi.org/10.14421/al-bidayah.v11i01.175

Arifin, I. (1993). Kepemimpinan Kiai: Kasus Pondok Pesantren Tebuireng. Malang: Kalimashada.

Bakar, I. A. (n.d.). Strengthening Core Values Pesantren As A Local Wisdom Of Islamic Higher Education Through Ma’had Jami’ah. In IOP Conference Series: Earth And Enviromental Science. https://doi.org/DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/175/1/012144

Bariah, S. (2020). Guru dan Orang Tua dalam Interaksi Edukatif. Jurnal Intelektualita: Keislaman, Sosial Dan Sains, 9(2), 257–268. https://doi.org/10.19109/intelektualita.v9i2.5975

Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic Interaction: Perspective and Methodq. Englewood Cliff, N.J: Prentice Hal, Inc.

Bruinessen, M. Van. (1999). NU, Tradisi, Relasi-relasi Kuasa, Pencarian Wacana Baru. Yogyakarta: LKis.

Darajat, Z. (1992). Ilmu Pendidikan Islam. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Davis, B. . (1996). Teacher of The Future. Journal of The American Society For Information Science, 47(11), 849–853. https://doi.org/doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(199611)47:11<849::aid-asi8>3.0.co;2-2

Dhofier, Z. (2011). Tradisi Pesantren: Studi Tentang Pandangan Hidup Kiai. Jakarta: LP3ES.

Djamarah, S. B. (2014a). Guru dan Anak Didik dalam Interaksi Edukatif. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Djamarah, S. B. (2014b). Guru dan Anak Didik Dalam Interaksi Edukatif. Jakarta: PT.Rineka Cipta.

Emzir. (2011). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif: Analisis Data. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Fajar, M. (2005). Holistik Pemikiran Pendidikan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Gillin, J. L. G. and J. P. (1954). Cultural Sociology. New York: The Macmillan Company.

Goodman, G. R. & D. J. (2011). Sociological Theory. In Teori Sosiologi: Dari Teori Sosiologi Klasik Sampai perkembangan Teori Sosial Postmodern (p. 384). Bantul: Kreasi Wacana.

Harahap, A. Y. M. (2022). Pola Komunikasi Satu Arah Sebagai Interaksi Edukatif Dalam Kisah Nabi Ādam As. TA’LIM : Jurnal Studi Pendidikan Islam, 5(2), 140–153. https://doi.org/10.52166/talim.v5i2.3027

Hasibuan, D. N. (2014). Pembelajaran Religiositas Pendidikan Agama Islam Proses Pembelajaran Dalam Interaksi Edukatif. Forum Pedagogik, 98–110. https://doi.org/DOI: https://doi.org/10.24952/paedagogik.v0i0.464

Howard, K. (2018). The Emergence of Children’s Multicultural Sensitivity: An Elementary School Music Culture Project. Journal of Research in Music Education, 66(3). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/002242941878459

ʻAbd al-Ṣamad al-Falimbānī. (n.d.-a). Hidayatut al-Sālikīn. Indonesia: Syirkah Maktabah al-Madaniyah.

ʻAbd al-Ṣamad al-Falimbānī. (n.d.-b). Sīrus al-Sālikīn (Juz 1). Indonesia: Dar Ahya` Kutubul `Arabiyah.

K.H, O’Rourke,. and Williamson, J. . (1999). Globalization and History: Evolution of a Nineteenth-Century Atlantic Economy. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Katia Fredriksen, J. R. (2004). The Role of Teacher Relationship in The Lives of Students. New Directions for Youth Development, 2004(103), 45–54. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.90

Khaidir, E., & Suud, F. M. (2020). Islamic Education in Developing Students ’ Characters At As-Shofa Islamic High School ,. Islamic Education in Developing Students’ Characters At As-Shofa Islamic High School, Pekanbaru Riau, 1(1), 50–63.

Kurniawan, M. H. S. dan S. (2012). Studi Ilmu Pendidikan Islam. Jogjakarta: Ar-Ruzz.

M. Athiyah al-Abrasyi. (1970). Dasar Pokok Pendidikan Islam. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang.

M.Jacky. (2015). Sosiologi: Konsep, Teori dan Metode. Jakarta: Mitra Wacana.

M.S Orozco and Hilliard, D. . (2004). Globalization: Culture and Education in the New Millenium. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Ma’arif, S. (2010). Pola hubungan patron-client Kiai dan santri di pesantren. Ta’dib, 15(2), 273–296. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.19109/td.v15i02.76

Madjid, N. (1997). Bilik-bilik Pesantren: Sebuah Potret Perjalanan. Jakarta: Paramadina.

Maimun Aqsha Lubis, Melor MD Yunus, Noriah Mohd Ishak, Tajul Arifin Muhamad, M. D. (n.d.). The Effectiveness of Strategies and Techniques in Teaching and Learning Islamic Education. In Selected Topics in Education and Educational Technology. https://doi.org/ISBN: 978-960-474-232-5

Mardiyah. (2012). Kepemimpinan Kiai dalam Memelihara Budaya Organisasi. Malang: Aditya Media Publishing.

Mastuhu. (1994). Dinamika Sistem Pendidikan Pesanantren, Suatu Kajian tentang Unsur dan Nilai Sistem Pendidikan Pesantren. Jakarta: INIS.

Maursy, M. M. (1977). Al-Tarbiyah al-Islamiyah: Ushuluha wa Tathawwuruha fi Bilad al-Arabiyyah. Kairo: A’lam al-Kutub.

Mawardi, D., & Supadi, S. (2018). Concentration on Learning Program Development in Islamic Education. AL-HAYAT: Journal of Islamic Education, 2(2), 213. https://doi.org/10.35723/ajie.v2i2.35

Michael. E Beeth,., & P. W. H. (1999). Learning goals in an exemplary science teacher’s practice: Cognitive and social factors in teaching for conceptual change. Science Education, 83(6), 738–760. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199911)83:6<738::AID-SCE6>3.0.CO;2-9

Miriam Ben Peretz. (2001). The Impossibel Role of Teacher Educators in a Changging World. Journal of Teacher Education, 52(1), 48–56. https://doi.org/DOI:10.1177/0022487101052001005

Mirray Tekkumru-Kisa & Christian Schunn. (2019). Integrating a space for teacher interaction into an educative curriculum: design principles and teachers’ use of the iPlan tool. Technnology, Pedagogy and Education, 28(2), 133–155. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1080/1475939X.2019.1595707

Mohd Aliff Mohd Nawi, Ezad Azraai Jamsari, Mohd Isa Hamzah, A. S. and A. U. (2012). The Impact of Globalization on Current Islamic Education. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 6(8), 74–78.

Mohd Izham, Amirah Ismail, M. A. E. (2009). The impact of technology change in malaysian smart schools on islamic education teachers and students. International Journal of Human and Social Sciences, 4(11). Retrieved from http//:www.wou.edu.my

Morgan, L. (2012). Generation Y, learner autonomy and the potential of Web 2.0 tools for language learning and teaching. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 29(3), 166–176. https://doi.org/10.1108/10650741211243184

Muhammad Barir. (2018). Sejarah Kelas dan Masyarakat Egaliter Mendamaikan Ras, Patronasi, Hingga Borjuis dan Proletar. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/22048541-/Sejarah_Kelas_dan_Masyarakat Egaliter_Mendamaikan_Patronasi_Ras_hingga_Borjuis_ dan_Proletar

Nata, A. (2001). Paradigma Pendidikan Islam: Kapita Selekta Pendidikan Islam. Jakarta: Grasindo.

Nugroho, T. A. (2017). Integration of Islamic Education With Science and Technology In Islamic Junior High School. Mudarrisa, Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Islam, 9(1). https://doi.org/DOI: https://doi.org/10.18326/mdr.v9i1.1-27,

Osborne, M. D. (1998). Teacher as knower and learner: Reflections on situated knowledge in science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(4), 427–439. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199804)35:4<427::AID-TEA12>3.0.CO;2-6

Ritzer, G. (2011). Sociology A Multiple Paradigm Science terj: Sosiologi Ilmu Pengetahuan Berparadigma Ganda. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Sahertian, P. A. (1998). Profil Pendidik Profesional. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.

Saifullah. (2005). Muhammad Quthub dan Sistem Pendidikan Non Dikotomik. Yogyakarta: Suluh Press.

Setiawan, E. (2012). EKSISTENSI BUDAYA PATRON KLIEN DALAM PESANTREN : Studi Hubungan Antara Kiai dan Santri. Ulul Albab Jurnal Studi Islam, 13(2), 137–152. https://doi.org/DOI:10.18860/ua.v0i0.2372

Sheikh, S., & Ali, M. (2019). Al-Ghazali’s Aims and Objectives of Islamic Education. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 6(1), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v6i1.2033

Soekamto, S. (2012). Sosiologi Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Steenbrink, K. A. (1984). Beberapa Aspek Tentang Islam di Indonesia Abad ke-19. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang.

Suriadi. (2018). Etika Interaksi Edukatif Guru dan Murid Menurut Perspektif Syaikh ʻAbd Al-Ṣamad Al-Falimbānī. Dayah: Journal Of Islamic Education, 1(2), 145–163. https://doi.org/DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/jie.v1i2.2928

Suyitno. (2009). Tokoh-Tokoh Pendidikan Dunia. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Sya’roni. (2007). Model Realsi Ideal Guru dan Murid: Telaah Atas Pemikiran al-Zarnuji dan KH. Hasyim Asy’Ari. Yogyakarta: Sukses Offset.

Syah, M. (2003). Psikologi Belajar. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Tafsir, A. (1994). Ilmu Pendidikan Dalam Perspektif Islam. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.

Tobroni. (2008). Pendidikan Islam: Paradigma Teologis, Filosofis dan Spiritualitas. Malang: UPT. Penerbitan UMM.

Tolchah, M., & Mu’ammar, M. A. (2019). Islamic education in the globalization era; challenges, opportunities, and contribution of islamic education in indonesia. Humanities and Social Sciences Reviews, 7(4), 1031–1037. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.74141

Usman, M. U. (2000). Menjadi Guru Profesional. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.

Yosi Ayuliansari, M. I. H. &Muh Z. (2022). Pengaruh Interaksi Edukatif Guru Terhadap Akhlak Peserta Didik Pada Mata Pelajaran Akidah Akhlak. Nahdlatain: Jurnal Kependidikan Dan Pemikiran Islam, 1(1), 39–46. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51806/nahdlatain.v1i1.65

Zed, M. (2004). Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Zein, M. (2016). Peran Guru Dalam Pengembangan Pembelajaran. Inspiratif Pendidikan, 5(2), 274–285.

Ziemik, M. (1986). Pesantren Dalam Perubahan Sosial. Jakarta: P3M.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-27

How to Cite

Mafrudlo, A. M., Mansur, Z. A., Wasath, G., & Muttaqien, M. E. (2023). The Construction of Educational Interaction Models in Pesantren and Its Relevance to Contemporary Islamic Education. Progresiva : Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Pendidikan Islam, 12(01), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.22219/progresiva.v12i01.27896