The acceptance rate | 16 % |
Submission to a final decision | 138 days |
Sinta Impact | 1.03 |
h-index Google Scholar | 15 |
Guidelines for Reviewers
Responsibility of Peer Reviewer
Peer reviewer is responsible for critiquing by reading and evaluating manuscripts in the field of expertise, then giving constructive advice and honest feedback to the author of the article submitted. Peer reviewers, discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the article, how to increase the strength and quality of the paper, and evaluate the relevance and authenticity of the manuscript.
Before reviewing, please note the following:
Review Process
When reviewing the article, please consider the following:
Content of the Article
In order to determine the originality and suitability for the journal, are there any elements of plagiarism over 25% of this paper field? Quick literature search can use certain tools such as Scopus to see if there are similarities from other parts.
Method
Comprehensive and perfect:
Results:
This is where the author must explain the findings in his/her research. It should be clearly laid out and in a logical sequence. You will need to consider whether the appropriate analysis has been carried out; the use of statistical tools? If you have a better statistical tools to be used in this study, notify it, and the interpretation need not to be included in this section.
Discussion and Conclusion:
Tables and Pictures:
Is it suitable with the referred explanation by showing data which is easy to to interprete and understanable for the readers?
Writing Styles
Things that need to be considered:
Originality Research
Reference
Final Review
- Plagiarism: if you suspect the article is mostly plagiarism from other authors, please let the editor knows the details
- Fraud: It is very difficult to detect a fraud catogory, but if you suspect the results in the article is not true, please inform the editor
Complete "The Review" by the due date to the editorial office. Your recommendation for the article will be considered when the editor makes a final decision and your honest feedback is highly appreciated.
When you write a comment, please show the part of the comment that is only intended for the editor and parts that can be returned to the author.
Please do not hesitate to contact the editorial office with any questions or problems that you may encounter.
OUR EDITORIAL TEAM |
Editor in Chief |
|
Dana Marsetiya Utama University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Malang, Indonesia |
|
Managing Editor |
|
Thomy Eko Saputro University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Malang, Indonesia |
|
Associate Editor |
|
Prof. Benny Tjahjono Coventry University, Coventry, United Kingdom |
|
Ferry Jie Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia |
|
CITATION ANALYSIS |
Jurnal Teknik Industri Citedness in Scopus: 60 times (Scopus, EXPORT DATE: 30 November 2021) See More.
ISSN PRINT |
ISSN ONLINE |